How much does Zluri cost for 250 employees?

Zluri does not publish pricing. Based on market intelligence and buyer accounts, contracts for a 250-employee company typically start in the $60,000–$100,000 per year range, though actual quotes depend on modules selected, contract length, and professional services scope. KINT's Growth plan for 250 employees is $1,250 per month ($15,000 per year), published at kingsleyint.com/pricing.

How long does Zluri take to set up?

G2 reviews for Zluri report an average implementation time of approximately three months. Zluri's professional services team typically manages the rollout, which includes IdP configuration, policy setup, and app catalogue onboarding. KINT's OAuth setup runs under five minutes; a first workflow runs the same day you sign up.

Does Zluri require an identity provider like Okta?

Zluri supports multiple IdP sources and can ingest from HRMS systems, but the governance architecture is typically deployed alongside an Okta or Microsoft Entra environment. KINT runs without an IdP — the HR system is the trigger source, and KINT pushes directly to target apps. If you have an IdP, KINT runs alongside it and covers the apps your IdP can't reach.

What's the difference between Zluri and KINT?

Zluri is enterprise IGA and SaaS management for companies with 500+ employees that have identity or security teams and a complex governance requirement. KINT is HR-driven lifecycle automation for IT operators at 100–500 employee companies who want self-serve setup, transparent pricing, and no professional services engagement. Different ICP, different entry model, different price point.

Is Zluri overkill for a 200-person company?

For most 200-person companies with one or two IT generalists, yes. The three-month implementation, enterprise pricing, and governance policy engine are built for teams with the budget and internal headcount to absorb them. That said, if your 200-person company has an unusually complex SaaS stack and a strict compliance programme, the evaluation is worth running.

Does KINT support all the apps Zluri does?

No. Zluri has a broader enterprise integration catalog, but this repo does not cite a verified native API integration count. KINT has 48 live API and SCIM connectors with 200 more mapped on the roadmap, plus browser automation for apps like Adobe Creative Cloud that don't have provisioning APIs. If you need a specific connector confirmed before you sign, ask — the honest answer is more useful than a number.

Can I try KINT before paying?

Yes — 14-day free trial, no card required, no auto-conversion. A Microsoft 365 company can sign up and run a workflow today at app.kingsleyint.com/signup.

What's the best Zluri alternative for mid-market?

It depends on your specific need. For HR-driven lifecycle with published pricing and self-serve setup: KINT. For pure SaaS workflow automation: Torii. For a managed service: Stitchflow. For a directory replacement with lifecycle features: JumpCloud.

Does KINT handle SaaS license waste like Zluri does?

Yes, via the SaaS Access Intelligence module on the Growth plan. It surfaces dormant accounts, wrong-tier licenses, admin sprawl, and ghost seats — queryable via Claude or ChatGPT through MCP, with reads free and mutations requiring human approval. Zluri's SaaS Management module is more mature and extends into procurement and contract renewals, which KINT does not currently cover.

How does KINT's MCP integration compare to Zluri's AI features?

Different philosophy. KINT's MCP integration lets you query your identity and access data through any AI tool — reads are free, mutations require explicit human approval. Zluri's CoPilot uses generative AI to help configure and automate workflows, while IRIS (Identity Risk Intelligence System) surfaces access risk across dashboards. KINT keeps humans in the loop on every change; Zluri embeds AI into a full governance analytics layer.

What about SOC 2 evidence — which is faster to set up?

KINT's SOC 2 evidence model is built in by default: every workflow action is Ed25519-signed and mapped to SOC 2 CC6.1, CC6.2, and CC6.3. If you're running lifecycle workflows, you're collecting audit evidence automatically. KINT's SOC 2 Type I is complete; Type II is in the audit period. Zluri's governance reports are available but typically require configuration and a more mature deployment.

Can KINT replace Zluri for 500-employee companies?

It depends on what you're solving. KINT's Growth plan runs up to 500 employees. If your primary need is HR-driven lifecycle automation without an identity engineering team, KINT works at 400–500 employees. If your need extends to deep SaaS governance, procurement workflows, and policy enforcement across a broad enterprise app estate, Zluri is still the better fit.

KINT vs Zluri

Enterprise IGA vs. mid-market lifecycle automation.

KINT

Self-serve lifecycle

Zluri

Enterprise IGA + SaaS management

Faster to value. Lower cost. Self-serve.

TL;DR

Zluri is a next-generation IGA and SaaS management platform built for enterprises with identity teams. Typical contracts start at $40,000–$80,000 per year for 500 employees, with a 6–12 week professional-services rollout. KINT is HR-driven identity lifecycle for the 100–500 mid-market — self-serve OAuth setup in under an hour, published pricing at $3–$5 per employee per month, and no identity team required. Zluri is broader and deeper. KINT is faster to value.

Category	Zluri	KINT
Primary ICP	Enterprise, 500–5,000 emp	Mid-market, 100–500 emp
Pricing	Quote-based, not published	$3–$5 per employee, transparent
Setup time	6–12 weeks (G2: ~3-month avg)	Under 1 hour, self-serve
HRMS-first	Supports HRMS; IdP-centric by default	Yes — HR event is the lifecycle trigger
Browser automation	Primarily API/SCIM; limited	Growth (up to 5 apps) + Custom (unlimited)
IdP required	Typically yes (Okta/Entra)	Optional
Access reviews	✓ (deep governance engine)	✓ (essentials)
AI/MCP	CoPilot + IRIS	MCP (open standard, human-in-loop)
App coverage	Broad enterprise catalog (exact native API count not cited)	200 mapped, 48 live
Free trial	Sales call required	14 days, no card

When to choose KINT

You have 100–500 employees and one or two IT operators, not a dedicated identity team
You want transparent per-employee pricing and self-serve setup, not a quote and a 6-week professional services engagement
Your HRMS is the natural source of truth and you don't want an IdP in the middle
You need lifecycle automation running this week — not after a multi-month rollout

When to choose Zluri

You're 1,000+ employees with a dedicated identity and security team
You need a broad enterprise integration catalog including legacy and on-prem enterprise apps
You're already on Okta or Entra and need deep governance, policy enforcement, and SaaS spend management

Pricing comparison

KINT Growth

$30K/year

$5 × 500 employees × 12 months

Zluri

$40–80K/year

Typical 500-employee contract range (market estimate)

Zluri: quote-based, typical contracts start at $40K–$80K/year for 500 employees
KINT: $30K/year for 500 employees on Growth ($5 × 500 × 12)

We're early. Here's how we talk to evaluators today.

KINT has no paying customers yet — we're actively looking for our first design partners, and we say that plainly. What we hear most often from IT leaders evaluating Zluri vs. KINT in our LinkedIn conversations:

"Your pricing is on the website. Zluri's isn't. That alone got me on a call."
"I don't have an identity team. The Zluri rollout assumes I do."
"I want the workflow to be readable. Not an AI making the call."

If that sounds like your situation, the 14-day free trial (no card) is the fastest way to see it on your stack. Or book a 15-minute walkthrough.